Newsela, the education technology company that is using nonfiction to transform K literacy, announced today it has entered an agreement to adapt content from Scientific American, the longest continuously published magazine in the United States, for students at multiple reading levels. The partnership with Scientific American will allow Newsela to expand its coverage of science, technology, engineering and math topics STEM with the most engaging and up-to-date content available at a time when science teachers are being asked to incorporate cross-curricular reading skills into their instruction. All articles will published by Newsela at five reading levels for 3rdth grade readers, including the original version as it appears in the print or online edition of Scientific American. Newsela became one of the fastest growing K technology startups last year by giving educators a way to teach reading across a range of abilities and subject areas. Launched in , more than , teachers have assigned more than 11 million Newsela articles to their students, placing Newsela among the most quickly adopted educational technologies in history. When students read articles and take Common Core-aligned quizzes online, they are developing the critical nonfiction literacy skills that empower them to take part in conversations about complex issues, and prepare them for academic and professional success. Founded in , Scientific American is the oldest continuously published magazine in the U.
Up Your Online Dating Game with Evidence-Based Strategies
Chemistry World and Scientific American have announced an exciting content sharing partnership where selected cutting edge chemistry content from Chemistry World will appear on the Scientific American website. Scientific American’s senior editor Josh Fischman said: “I have long been impressed by the quality and depth of Chemistry World’s material and our readers will gain a lot from these stories about the molecules and materials that make up our world.
Chemistry World’s editor Bibana Campos-Seijo is equally positive about the partnership. She said: “This is a fantastic opportunity for us to reach new and diverse audiences and I’m sure it will be a long-lasting and mutually beneficial relationship. About Scientific American Scientific American is at the heart of Nature Publishing Group’s consumer media division, meeting the needs of the general public. Founded in , Scientific American is the longest continuously published magazine in the U.
Scientific American is using Acoustic Campaign to streamline its digital But now that digital marketing is top of mind for them, finding ways to optimize their 10+ million global online unique visitors monthly, and a social media reach of 7+ million. This document is current as of the initial date of publication and may be.
Imagine this scenario: A young man walks into a popular singles bar. He places himself strategically in the center of the room so that he is in a sociable distance to the greatest number of women. His behavior eventually gets the young man forcibly thrown out of the bar. However, this is exactly the approach that is expected to work for online dating. If online dating strategies were employed in an offline context, they would be highly unsuccessful.
Only online is it socially acceptable to show interest in multiple potential partners at the same time. Only online can people talk almost entirely about themselves without being labeled a narcissist. Only on the Internet do first impressions rely completely on what people selectively choose to reveal about themselves, to an exacting standard of honesty, rather than by observation and social cues. Due to these rhetorical strategies, the mechanics of online dating and the popular definition of what constitutes a successful profile, dating websites can influence users to embrace deceptive broad appeals in their profiles, rather than specific and authentic ones.
The rhetoric employed by individual users in online dating walks a tight rope between growing its audience to maximize a potential for connection, and limiting its audience to eventually achieve the shared goal of finding a single lifelong partner. The methods employed for generating increased communication on the dating website often work against the underlying goal of finding a single, perfect match for a life-long partner, creating a conflicting tension between what is considered effective rhetorical strategy for online dating, and what is healthy for authentic offline relationships.
While it is generally accepted that the best relationships begin with honesty, one of the main strategies online websites encourage their users to employ is to appeal to as many potential matches as possible. Often what is framed as successful online profiles encourages practices of deceit.
Top Psychology Magazines and Journals for Therapists
Dating site for science nerds Kempster nerds also famous among the geek dating network, and nerd. Forget expensive dating nerds. Trumpsingles is all online connections dating nerd. Why dating exquisite your local science and which sites?
Though this makes it an exciting field to study, staying up to date on the Scientific American Mind is a great read for anyone who doesn’t want.
Got a minute? Some of these evidence-based tactics are obvious. Post an attractive profile pic. Be nice. Be funny. Others are less so. For example, pick a user name that starts with letters in the first half of the alphabet. A through M seem to up the odds. And when filling in your profile, keep in mind the golden ratio. A profile all about you might come across as self-absorbed. As for photos, previous studies suggest a genuine smile and a slight head tilt will boost your appeal.
And group photos that showcase the fact that other people have fun around you are a good thing.
Throughout the text the author teams focuses on the top 10 Challenges facing instructors. Do you face any of these in your classroom? What students take from psychology will help them become a more successful student, professional, friend, partner, parent, brother, or sister—a better citizen of the world. Chapter 0 prepares them for their journey.
The Libraries have acquired the digital collection of the Scientific American Archive dating from to This has been added to our.
Subject Scientific and Technological Literacy. Philosophical issues of mind-body duality, the power of positive and negative suggestion, and the influence of brain architecture on behaviour will be critically examined. References Carroll, A. Calling an ordinary health problem a disease leads to bigger problems. The NY Times.
Englert, H. Sussing out stress. Scientific American Mind, 14 1 ,
A scientific approach to boosting revenue with email
Starting first at describing how this conceptualisation can be conducted in the traditional way of theori-sation well known by the academics, this chapter then indicates how less formal approaches such as narratives can be used to help to understand the concept. The second part of the chapter is used to illustrate how each of these approaches have been operationalised by presenting a series of models and scenarios presenting different perspectives and issues that are relevant to the subject, and a collaborative Web 2.
Every day, millions of single adults, worldwide, visit an online dating site. Please send suggestions to Mind Matters editor Gareth Cook.
Every day, millions of single adults, worldwide, visit an online dating site. Many are lucky, finding life-long love or at least some exciting escapades. Others are not so lucky. The industry—eHarmony, Match, OkCupid, and a thousand other online dating sites—wants singles and the general public to believe that seeking a partner through their site is not just an alternative way to traditional venues for finding a partner, but a superior way.
Is it? With our colleagues Paul Eastwick, Benjamin Karney, and Harry Reis, we recently published a book-length article in the journal Psychological Science in the Public Interest that examines this question and evaluates online dating from a scientific perspective. We also conclude, however, that online dating is not better than conventional offline dating in most respects, and that it is worse is some respects. Indeed, in the U. Of course, many of the people in these relationships would have met somebody offline, but some would still be single and searching.
Indeed, the people who are most likely to benefit from online dating are precisely those who would find it difficult to meet others through more conventional methods, such as at work, through a hobby, or through a friend. Ever since Match.
The Science of Online Dating
Use the Destiny link in the box to the right to find other titles in our collection. If you are at home you will need to enter the remote password see the Home Access box to the right. General press or popular media sources such as newspapers, magazines, and books are used for the introduction. Books from our collection. Use Destiny to search or the one’s hi-lighted on this page.
Scientific American the oldest continuously published magazine in Scientific American, Scientific American Mind, and all Special Issues. (b) the first date of publication or (c), the date on which Licensor first online access to articles that have more of a focus on pure science than Scientific American.
We live in a golden age of online dating, where complex algorithms and innovative apps promise to pinpoint your perfect romantic match in no time. And yet, dating remains as tedious and painful as ever. A seemingly unlimited supply of swipes and likes has resulted not in effortless pairings, but in chronic dating-app fatigue. Nor does online dating seem to be shortening the time we spend looking for mates; Tinder reports that its users spend up to 90 minutes swiping per day. The concept comes at a time when the personalized genetics business is booming.
Pheramor analyzes the spit to identify 11 genes that relate to the immune system. The assumption is that people prefer to date those whose DNA is different enough from their own that a coupling would result in a more diverse, likely-to-survive offspring. The way we can sense that DNA diversity is through scent. Pheramor does not just look at genetic diversity, though.
The field of psychology is fast-paced and constantly changing. Though this makes it an exciting field to study, staying up to date on the continuously evolving research can often prove to be overwhelming. Whether you are looking for a light read on topics that interest you or a deep dive into research-heavy perspectives, there is something for you on this list.
With over citations over the last three years, Psychological Bulletin is one of the most cited psychology journals out there.
Scientific American is the essential guide to the most awe-inspiring advances in science and technology, with the title “Finding Love Online” in SA Mind 27, 4, 7-8 (July ) Don’t Hide Your Identity on Online Dating Sites.
Leading science journalists provide a weekly one-minute commentary on the latest developments in the science of brain and behavior. To view all our archived podcasts please visit: www. Listen on Apple Podcasts. Choosing a user name starting with a letter appearing earlier in the alphabet is just one scientifically vetted way to increase the odds of turning an online encounter into a first date.
Christopher Intagliata reports. High-calorie and exceedingly pleasurable foods appear to change rat brain rewards circuitry, causing the rodents to continue to seek such fare. Erika Beras reports. Karen Hopkin reports.
In case you didn’t already know this, your brain on love is crazy. If seeing the one you love makes your heart skip a beat, should you see a cardiologist? The popular idea that women should try to conform or be submissive around men is outdated.
Open Science. Research Intelligence. Research Community. Your Career. When my marriage ended 11 years ago, I went online. I hadn’t dated in over 20 years. I never liked bars. All of my friends were married. But with 87 million singles in the United States and nearly 40 million dating online, it seemed a good way to meet someone.
Quick Questions About Scientific American Español
As my late mother used to say when soothing one of my teenage heartbreaks: “There are plenty of other fish in the sea. She would be amazed to discover that tens of millions of Americans are now casting for those fish on the vast waters of the Internet. I am not here to endorse one online dating site over another or to advocate the process.
sCIENtIFIC AMERICAN MIND Amanda Boxtel takes To date, I have walked more than , steps with Tuck- er. The health benefits have 11, Article No. Published online December 19,
No eBook available Macmillan Amazon. Love — in both the abstract and the up-close-and-personal — has always provided limitless inspiration for artists, writers and musicians, but scientists are just as fascinated by these affairs of the heart, though they seldom sing about it. In this eBook, Disarming Cupid: Love, Sex and Science, our editors take a step back, analyzing romance using tools like fMRI studies instead of a paint brush or guitar. The writers examine a variety of topics, starting with the perceived sex differences between men and women discussed in Section 1 — are we really as different as Mars and Venus?
Subsequent sections tackle other facets of love, including the implications of the drastic rise in online dating, how we choose our romantic partners and what happens in our brains when we’re in love. In particular “All You Need Is Love” finds — or, perhaps for some, verifies — that romantic love stimulates the same pathways as an addictive drug. Section 5 focuses on issues of gender and sexuality.
We also don’t shy away from darker aspects of love, such as the psychology of prostitution and sex appeal of narcissists, because to ignore these aspects of love is to trivialize it.